Remove the WWW
I have always preferred not to use “WWW.” for urls to my sites (on links, site promotions …etc), I dont even type “WWW.” on my browser’s address bar. Because I have always realized it’s an unwanted part on a domain.
World Wide Web:
Abbr. WWW
• The complete set of documents residing on all Internet servers that use the HTTP protocol, accessible to users via a simple point-and-click system.
• A collection of internet sites that offer text and graphics and sound and animation resources through the hypertext transfer protocol.By default, all popular Web browsers assume the HTTP protocol. In doing so, the software prepends the ‘http://’ onto the requested URL and automatically connect to the HTTP server on port 80. Why then do many servers require their websites to communicate through the www subdomain? Mail servers do not require you to send emails to recipient@mail.domain.com. Likewise, web servers should allow access to their pages though the main domain unless a particular subdomain is required.
Succinctly, use of the www subdomain is redundant and time consuming to communicate. The internet, media, and society are all better off without it.
But am not redirecting site traffic from www url to non-www url. But if you want to do so, add the following code on the ‘.htacccess’ file on your site’s root folder.
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.domain\.com$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L]
Above code (301 permanent) redirects all requests on ‘www.domain.com’ to ‘domain.com’, but it is better if you also make sure to edit all inner links within the site to be non-www.


August 24th, 2007 at 1:05 am
You know? This might be good for domains like http://no-www.org, because you have to type all the url into the address bar. But domains like your will have a problem in usability context, because there is no point of typing all the URL, while you can just type the domain name and press ctrl+ENTER to include full url.
And if you are not redirecting from www, to non www, remember, you are splitting your incomming links to two, and that will affect your PR as well as SEO.
-Nish
August 24th, 2007 at 1:35 am
Hey thanx for the comment! I really appreciated it, please visit me again at sajadghaffoor.blogspot.com
August 24th, 2007 at 3:28 am
i think the www has become more of a marketing prefix than a functional one
but i feel your pain!
:)
August 25th, 2007 at 3:33 pm
@ Nish:
It’s not about typing a long url am worried of, Am trying to say that, WWW part in a URL could be ignored
But SEO point of view is differ among Search engines on WWW urls and non-WWW urls. Google allows us to use a single version of the urls with it’s Gogle Sitemaps tool. Haven’t researched about others on this topic. But I guess this wouldn’t affect sites much.
August 26th, 2007 at 8:46 am
@ Shehal:
You got it, It has no function, not functional, unless you have two versions of the site for www one and non-www one
August 26th, 2007 at 8:49 am
Best piece of advice on this matter : SEO advice: url canonicalization by Matt Cutt from Google
August 27th, 2007 at 5:36 am
No need to go far..
try these two versions of he same domain. http://slt.lk/ and http://www.slt.lk/
I think many .lk domains having problems without www.
Eg. http://rivira.lk/ ,